North Little Rock 72 in a 60 Speeding Ticket Dismissed | Arkansas Traffic Ticket Lawyer Case Result
- 3 hours ago
- 2 min read
Benton, Arkansas – July 10, 2026 – Mustain Law Firm, PLLC secured a favorable outcome for its client in a speeding case in the 31st State District Court, North Little Rock Department.
Attorney Logan Mustain represented the defendant in a case involving:
Speeding 1–15 MPH Over the Speed Limit — Ark. Code Ann. § 27-51-201
According to the citation and certified docket, the defendant, a Pennsylvania commercial driver, was cited for allegedly traveling 72 miles per hour in a 60 mile per hour zone on Interstate 40 eastbound near the 157-mile marker in Pulaski County, Arkansas.
The defendant entered a not guilty plea, discovery was requested, and the case proceeded through multiple review hearings before trial. On July 1, 2026, the speeding charge was dismissed, resulting in no conviction and no fines or court costs.
Case Outcome Highlights
Court: 31st State District Court – North Little Rock Department
Disposition Date: July 1, 2026
Case Type: Traffic Citation
Final Result:
72 MPH in a 60 MPH zone speeding charge dismissed
No speeding conviction
No fines
No court costs
Case closed
Driver License State: Pennsylvania (Commercial Driver)
Potential Penalties
A speeding citation under Ark. Code Ann. § 27-51-201 can result in:
A moving violation conviction
Driver record consequences in the driver's home state
Insurance premium increases
Potential consequences for commercial drivers and their employers
Fines and court costs
Why This Result Matters
Complete dismissal of the speeding charge
Avoided a moving violation conviction
Protected an out-of-state commercial driver's record
No fines or court costs assessed
Favorable resolution after litigation rather than a guilty plea
Strategic Traffic Defense Matters
Mustain Law Firm represents drivers throughout Arkansas, including CDL holders and out-of-state motorists, in speeding cases and other traffic violations.
Learn more about Arkansas traffic defense:
Criminal defense representation:
Comments